Re: phk malloc, was (Re: ptmalloc2)

[Dan Melomedman <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Christopher Weimann wrote:
> On 02/23/2005-01:05AM, Dan Melomedman wrote:
> > 
> > Bill Hacker wrote:
> > > I still thing fixing the application is preferable.
> > 
> > What's there to fix if it's not the application's fault?
> 
> If Messagewall accepts a message over SMTP and tells the sending server
> "200" it is saying it has the message and will deliver it when it in
> fact may not. Thats just plain busted.

But it doesn't do that.

> Even if you were to have the memory gauranties you are looking for
> losing power to the machine will loss email. If this is how Messagewall
> works it is just plain busted.

MessageWall doesn't do that.