| From: | "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:34:10 +0100 |
On Monday, 10. January 2005 22:05, Antonio Vargas wrote: > I can but wonder if ths simple scheme would work: > > 1. We make some way to do #include on a makefile > > 2. When we #include a makefile, we alter it's target and dependencies > so that they get the proper path > > 3. At the end of reading the top-tree makefile memory has a master > makefile and we don't have to change any of the inner ones. that's what i've been thinking about, too. > I'm not that big a make hacker, but it can't be that bad internally... > did I miss something totally obvious??? yes: make is evil code to the max (pun). thankfully max is cleaning up make and maybe in the end we can figure out something like this. cheers simon -- /"\ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
pgp00001.pgp
Description: PGP signature