DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2004-09
Re: cvs and new distributions
:> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 07:26:13AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
:> > -On [20040830 06:12], YONETANI Tomokazu (qhwt+dragonfly-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
:> > >Actually there's no simple way in CVS to add unversioned tree into
:> > >a repository other than by using `cvs import'.
:> > So the question is, are we going to use cvs import for this again?
:> Why not? I don't see any problem in using `cvs import' to actually
:> import an external codes to our tree. Or did I miss an earlier discussion
:> against using `cvs import' at all?
:Did I receive any response to this message?
cvs import can be used, though what will happen is that we will
get a mess of random vendor tags and release tags. That's why
I prefer cvs add over cvs import. But I don't think it's a big