Re: kernel broken using CPUTYPE and 2.95.4

[Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@xxxxxx>]

-On [20040510 22:12], David Rhodus (drhodus@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>Well we already have a mudge in for when people try to use -O3 on a
>kernel build, I wonder if we should add this in too ?:-/ Saying that
>even though I don't like messing around with the options a user has
>specified.

I wholeheartedly agree with you on that David, however in this specific
case I just have to wonder if we should protect the users against
themselves and us from the users.  Yes, I know, I should've known
better, but what's the use in having CPUTYPE in make.conf if we _known_
it will create binaries which cause strange problems to creep up?  Might
as well just yank it and be done with the headache.

Opinions on this?  Matt?

That is, until I get the compiler done... *whistles*

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9DB7  9D88 97E6 839B 2EAC 625B
http://www.tendra.org/   | http://diary.in-nomine.org/
Everything comes to those who wait...