DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-12
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: configuration files
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:27:57AM -0600, James Frazer wrote:
> Just a hypothetical question I've been pondering lately:
>
> I'm just wondering what the future holds for configuration files found
> in /etc (or wherever for that matter) ? Are we ever going to see a
> shift towards an XML based config-system? Or is the general consensus
> that 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' ?
>
> I know there's a lot of merit/legacy in the standard *nix way of doing
> config files, but it seems kind of logical that an XML based
> config-system would be the next step. It's still text based, and
> therefore can be edited by hand (if necessary), but it can also be
> validated to ensure correctness (in structure & syntax).
>
> Is there any interest in this sort of thing?
>
> I'm just curious,
>
If changing anything on configuration files, I'd vote for integrating
CVS (or any equivalent repository) into the base configuration
so that all admins can have properly upgrading configurations
( http://www.infrastructures.org/ anyone? )
--
winden/network
1. Dado un programa, siempre tiene al menos un fallo.
2. Dadas varias lineas de codigo, siempre se pueden acortar a menos lineas.
3. Por induccion, todos los programas se pueden
reducir a una linea que no funciona.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]
[
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index]