Re: userapi: signals

[Peter da Silva <peter-dragonfly@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     There are a billion ways this could be handled.  I have no specific
>     thoughts on the best way to do it at the moment.  I would prefer that
>     the kernel not be aware of userland threading at all, though.  I want
>     userland threading to be under the complete control of userland.

Hmmm... the kernel would at least have to be aware of userland threading 
for processes that are threaded across multiple CPUs, no?

I would have thought that the ideal would be that userland threading and 
kernel threading are really the same thing, like kernel and userland 
messages. Or am I just missing something obvious?