Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/ftp-proxy ftp-proxy.c src/libexec/rexecd rexecd.c src/libexec/rlogind rlogind.c src/libexec/rshd rshd.c src/libexec/telnetd sys_term.c src/sbin/disklabel disklabel.c src/sbin/mount_portal activate.c src/usr.bin/rsh rsh.c .

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> > Matt, I know that you are conservative regarding DragonFly's 
> > infrastructure, and I think this is the right way to do it.  However I 
> > think this doesn't mean that we have to stick to CVS forever.  If 
> > there is a tool which is more reliable than CVS *and*
> How do you measure reliability?  I don't remember any other version
> control system that serves open source community as long as CVS.

You can't take a automatic benchmark, of course.  But you could -- for example -- review code + development process and underlying data structures.  The nice thing about CVS is that basically everything is in plain text and available in separate files.

cheers
 simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature