From: | Peter Avalos <pavalos@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:19:07 -0500 |
Mail-followup-to: | commits@crater.dragonflybsd.org |
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:56:28AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Here's a question for people... should we include gcc-4.1 binaries > in the release ISO in addition to 3.4? (i.e. compile nrelease with > WANT_GCC41 set). > I'd like to see the WANT_GCC41 go away (or change to NO_GCC41). It'll make it easier to switch over later. > My current inclination is to wait until we get 4.2 into the tree > before changing the default build to compile it. My expectation > is that we will be wanting to officially switch to 4.2 sometime this > year. I think we should switch over to 4.1.1 as the default after the release. --Peter
Attachment:
pgp00011.pgp
Description: PGP signature