Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16.08.2005, at 14:24, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:31:32PM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert 
> wrote:
> > On 15.08.2005, at 18:01, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > That is exactly the behaviour the standard wants to avoid. The 
> > > wording
> > > of SUS is also pretty clear, "resolve to the same existing name" does
> > > mean nothing less than having the same inode for a traditional Unix
> > > filesystem. I also won't say this behaviour is counter-intuitive, it
> > > makes as much sense as just dropping the old node.
> >
> > The standard is clear to me: it doesn't talk about links, but symbolic
> > links.
> No, it has been talking about symlinks explicitly before.

Exactly.  Re-reading the standard, it isn't just clear: it's absolutely 
clear.  This is just about symlinks.

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part