Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys select.2

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03.08.2005, at 17:13, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     Even nanosleep and usleep are wrong, since nanosleep uses a struct 
> timespec
>     and select uses a struct timeval.
>
>     Select's timeout is rounded up to the nearest clock tick, while 
> (our)
>     nanosleep's timeout tries to be a lot more precise.

What should we write?  It's just to note that select() does in fact 
block for the time specified, like sleep, usleep and nanosleep do (= 
interruptible sleep).

cheers
  simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part