Re: ctype bug

[Sascha Wildner <saw@xxxxxxxxx>]

Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:

> I have to second Joerg. I thought like Matt before, but after reading C99/SUS,
> it is clear that any program passing negative vlaues other than EOF is
> broken. It explicitly states that parameters must fit into an unsigned
> char or have the value of the macro EOF.

I didn't have an opinion before, but I'll second Joerg here as well, 
since SUS is pretty clear about the subject.

Sascha

--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx