Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile

[walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :I see that the libm I fetched just now is different than the one I
> :fetched yesterday -- so I guess this means the mirror I use has a
> :non-corrupt copy today?  Apparently cvsup doesn't check for such
> :things because I didn't get the different libm until I moved the old
> :one out of the way.
>
>     The actual file as committed hasn't changed, but the admin tag now
>     indicates that it is a binary so the checkout code is producing an
>     uncorrupted version of it.

I was worried that the mirrors may have fetched a bad copy yesterday
just the way I did -- and may still have a bad copy the same way I
would if I hadn't deleted yesterday's copy.

I don't know enough about the way mirrors update to know if this is
a possibility.