Re: nullfs mount ignores readonly flag

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Beck wrote:
> Would that fix mean that the no-setuid, no-exec and other flags will 
> work as well?
>
> Regards, David.
>
>
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> >    I expect there will be things that need working on.  That's one of
> >    them.  Hmm.  We will probably have to hold the namecache entry for
> >    normal files and use the namecache's mount point to check for the
> >    read-only filesystem status.  No biggy (we already do this for    
> > directories to maintain the CD path), but it may take a few days to
> >    fix.

Talking of nullfs:  I'd strongly advise not to use it in its current 
state in production.  There are many things that need to be resolved 
first.  See my post on kernel@

cheers
  simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \