Re: IPFW2 layer2 support broken.

[Yury Tarasievich <grog@xxxxxxx>]

Erik P. Skaalerud wrote:
> Jeffrey Hsu skrev:
>
> > Now that we have IPFW2 working (or will soon) thanks to Gary Allan's
> > tracking down the problem with ethernet headers, I wouldn't mind
> > getting rid of IPFW1.
>
>
> But IPFW2 still uses natd right? It's a ridicilously bad design of a NAT 
> system, it kills every mapping you have if you wanna load up a new config.

Please, let IPFW be there. Remove IPFW1, if anything.

--regards