Re: umass problems.

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:36:37PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> 
> Is there any reason why umass works when compiled directly into the
> kernel, even when "device atapicam" isn't in the config file?
> 
> Adam

Well, there are umass devices not using the ATAPI layer, but providing
e.g. a SCSI direct access emulation. For those the atapicam is not
needed. E.g. firewire does handle is correctly, but sbp doesn't need
to worry about ATAPI, ATA and direct SCSI packages ;-)

Joerg