DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2009-08
Re: cpdup: get latest source tarball, or git?
:In the process of updating Fedora's cpdup package, I started looking at
:Dragonfly's gitweb, in order to write an update summary. The timestamp
:on the tarball for cpdup 1.14 (March 2009), surprisingly, is *before*
:the release number bump is committed to git. It is, however, *after* a
:patch to the manpage has been committed in git, yet this patch is not in
:the released tarball.
:and whether patch contributions from outside packagers should target the
:latest standalone release, or target the git master? In this case, I
:have two patches, the first one will still apply either way, but the
:second patch fixes more typo errors in the manpage, and looking at the
:git changelog, will probably not apply without some changes since that
:file has been touched several times.
The one in our git repo is the master copy. I try to maintain
separate copies when individuals ask for specific portable items,
and also for packaging systems which want to fetch tarballs with
ftp, but I don't always manage to sync them up.
Because tarballs are MD5'd by packaging systems I can't update them
once released, short of rolling another version. I don't like rolling
another version just for minor non-operational changes such as
modifications to manual pages.