DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2008-07
Re: fdisk implementation
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:27:49 -0700
"Freddie Cash" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Matthew Dillon
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > :just a quick sidenote... while I decided to finally play around with hammer
> > :I had to fiddle around with dragonfly's fdisk implementation and I think it is a mess!
> > :The menu driven mode is horrible, and absolutely not self explaining.
> > :We should definitely adapt the OpenBSD or newer FreeBSD version.
> > :Is there any reason there could occur bigger problems with this ?
> > :Otherwise I'm actually willing to try to port it over during my semester break,
> > :because I really believe it is necessary to do this.
> > :If there is any special super mode I missed about the fdisk we are using right now just let me know!
> > :Regards,
> > :Tobias
> > :
> > :--
> > :Jost Tobias Springenberg <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > We could probably use a new fdisk, I think this would be a good
> > project.
> You may want to have a look at
> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/sfdisk/ This is the fdisk tool
> used in sysinstall, and has a decent interface. It's similar to
> cfdisk from the Linux-world (but nicer to use IMO).
> Freddie Cash
Ok I guess I will take a look at it tonight and also search for alternatives.
I'll have 2 weeks of time during the next 2 months so it should be possible to finish this.
Question to the sfdisk, I am not an expert regarding FreeBSD code,
but doesn't sfdisk depend on some internal FreeBSD disk abstractions ??
Jost Tobias Springenberg <email@example.com>
If you plan to send me any personal or sensitive information
please use GnuPG!
My public key can be found at: