DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2007-12
Re: Binary Updates for DragonFly
* Erik Wikstrm wrote:
> I would expect that if a user have some kind of "modified" binaries that
> is because they like it that way. To have an update-program replace
> those binaries with "standard" binaries might not be desirable at all.
> On the other hand, I would suspect that those user are not the primary
> target for such an update mechanism but rather for the more "casual"
> users who are running the "stock" installation.
> Of course more advanced user can use it but instead of downloading diffs
> >from some server they update their source and compile on a master server
> and the diffs are then fetched from there to the other installations.
I agree with you in all points. I see the advantage of binary updates
for two groups of users (there could be more):
- Inexperienced users happily running DragonFly as Desktop/Workstation
who want the latest security/errata fixes without touching the source.
- Administrators of servers/jails who run a "stock" installation and
also want the latest fixes. Besides that they maybe don't have the
time/experience to compile fixes on a master server.
Dipl.-Inf. Matthias Schmidt <email@example.com>
Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Distributed Systems Group
University of Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Strasse, 35032 Marburg, Germany
Tel: +49.6421.28 21 591, Fax: +49.6421.28 21 573, Office C4347