DragonFly BSD
DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2006-09
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hints on kernel config for a dula pII/450 system anyone?


From: Gergo Szakal <bastyaelvtars@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:10:04 +0200

<4511c833$0$789$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ea7b9c170609210811q383896e3k1b6af5bea1ded187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200609211554.k8LFsRNM098905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <200609211554.k8LFsRNM098905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <4512b91d$0$790$415eb37d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 160.114.118.67
X-Trace: 1158854942 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 790 160.114.118.67
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.users:7333

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 
>      Hmm.  All right, go ahead and nuke it.
> 
So should I just plain remove that assertion from if_bridge.c?
Should the last patch be left there or should I revert to the 
original/official version of the sk(4) driver's source?



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]