DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2006-05
Re: No GUI
I agree with Simon. The nrelease has a packaging framework and if
someone wants to put together a bigger release or a GUI-enabled
release or whatnot, all the tools are there to build it. If someone
(or some entity) wants to build and maintain a more sophisticated
release, nobody here is stopping them!
Even so I would caution against trying to have it boot into an actual
X environment. One of the big problems with X (for the last 20 years)
is that its virtually impossible to get a working high-resolution
desktop without a lot of playing around. Linux fares no better in
this regard... actually being able to boot a CD directly into X
has always been a hit-or-miss affair. It is probably best to have
even a sophisticated release CD boot into a console login prompt
with a list of simple instructions: login as 'root' or 'installer' or
* We have an nrelease infrastructure that allows one to very easily
construct customized release ISOs.
* I welcome someone making a project out of creating a fully GUI-enabled
ISO (well, at least after logging in as 'gui' or 'X' or whatever),
and I have no problem with such a project being committed to our
nrelease framework as another build target.
I think having such targets would be beneficial to the entire
community. For example, we could have one build that includes
a full GUI, and we could have another for DVDs that includes as
many packages as we can fit.
* If a third party (Some DragonFly developer, or some company, or
whoever) wants to maintain their own secondary release using
one of these new targets or creating their own proprietary build,
that's perfectly fine with me.
* The core release, however, is going to remain as it is. Its nice and
small and serves the developer base very well. I don't want the
core developers bogged down trying to maintain a large end-user
infrastructure, that isn't what DragonFly is about.