Re: why is sendmail the adopted mta?

["Martin P. Hellwig" <mhellwig@xxxxxxxxx>]

Miguel Filipe wrote:
<cut>
> 2) it has a lousy security track record
> 3) there are very good (superior) alternatives
>
> Why not use postfix has the default mta?
> 1) its secure
<cut>
Well security wise I would say I prefer sendmail, it has had more 
eyeballs then the others.

But perhaps license is also a issue, I don't know if the others have a 
bsd style licence?

On the other hand, nothing going to stop you to use another MTA 
(whatever color you like) so I don't realy see the problem with this.
Till this time sendmail is doing just fine for me and I would see no 
benefit/cost reason to rip it out for the favour of another MTA.

Perfomance wise I must say that I never had a problem with sendmails 
performance.

--
mph