Re: linux emulation COMPAT_43 removal part 1

[Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

:> 
:> http://gomerbud.com/daver/patches/dragonfly/linux-no43-1.diff
:> 
:
:	Hi David,
:
:	It would be great if the new syscalls are called kern_<name>
:	or _syscall_<name>, so bind1() would be either kern_bind() or
:	_syscall_bind().  This naming convention is better than sticking
:	a number after the syscall.
:
:	Also, name the header as kern_syscall.h.
:
:	These are my suggestions, everything else looks good.
:
:	Regards,
:
:		-- Hiten

    We were kinda following the already-existing convention in the source
    base, but I could go either way.  e.g. kern_bind() instead of bind1().
    Definite not _syscall_bind() (ick).  But before we make that sort of
    change I will commit the linux patch using the current naming 
    convention.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>