DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2009-03
Re: quota on hammer (was: Re: HAMMER status WEF March 2009 - outsider viewpoint)
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:30:52 +0100
"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <email@example.com> wrote:
> Bill Hacker wrote:
> > -- limited/no ability to enforce quotas / prevent overflow damage.
> I think Bill is hitting an interesting point here, which I'd like to
> discuss lightly:
> What is "quota" on hammer? Is it what "du" reports or is it what
> (including history) is stored on the HDD? I think we need to make a
> choice here before we can implement quotas.
Given that the main purpose of quotas is to protect against a user
filling the filesystem I think it has to be the actual storage including
This leads me to the thought that it may be useful to be able to
selectively throw away the history for a selected file, it's probably too
messy though given the presence snapshot symlinks.
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/