|From:||"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:02:59 +0100|
:another thing is that if all LWPs are sleeping in the kernel and some of = :these sleeps are interruptible, one of these LWPs has to receive the sign= :al by interrupting the sleep. so in any case we will have to run down th= :e list. on the other hand, signals don't happen that often. Hmm. What does POSIX say about which thread should get interrupted?
-- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Description: OpenPGP digital signature