Re: libc update progress?

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 01.05.2005, at 21:58, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     I agree re: the CVS bloat issue... *but* we can always remove it
>     later.  Right now I think it's more important to maintain 
> continuity
>     between the old and new libs.

how about this:

COMPAT_LIBS=	c.4 c_r.4 ncurses.5 m.2		# whatever

LATEST_LIBS=	# empty
. for lib in ${COMPAT_LIBS}
LATEST_${lib}!=	ls -r lib${lib:S/./.so./}* | head -n 1
LATEST_LIBS+=	${LATEST_${lib}}
. endfor

install:
. for lib in ${LATEST_LIBS}
	install ${lib} /usr/lib/compat/${lib:C/-[[:digit:]]*$//}
. endfor


with files there:
libc.so.4-20050414
libc.so.4-20050501
libm.so.2-20050414
libncurses.so.5-200504014

etc.

As you can see, libc has two files. the older one can easily be removed 
from cvs (repomeister stuff), as the makefile will always pick up the 
newer one. bloat doesn't increase.

cheers
  simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part