DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2005-04
Re: New nvidia driver obstacle
Jonas Sundström wrote:
Miguel Mendez <flynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's interesting but it looks like he's basing his code on the old
GLX code, so I'm not sure if he'll be able to support anything newer
than the GeForce1 gpu.
I think he explains this in the entry of March 3'rd. I believe
he wanted to start from a combination of parts known to
work together, on BeOS, and take small steps forward.
The posix-but-not-quite-unix platforms are clearly at a
disadvantage, in that we can't just recompile X & Co.
and be done. The latest everything compiles on Linux.
But we're not Linux. :I
It would be great if nVidia could release the specs
for their old cards, but given their track record it's quite
unlikely. You can always get an ATI card :-)
Are ATI any better at releasing spec?
I used to run BeOS 4.5 as my main desktop for a while
and there are some ideas from BeOS that might be
adapted to DragonFly. I'm thinking rich metadata mainly
and some parts of their API.
Yeah, the filesystem goodies of BeOS just make sense,
at least for desktop use. I believe POSIX extended attributes
could be used similarly, except they're untyped, (I think), which
complicates things, and there's no live indexing facility. Perhaps
the journaling mechanism will allow for wiretapping filesystem
metadata, to allow for stuff similar to BeOS's (live-) queries,
MacOS X' Spotlight, Linux' Beagle and whatever Microsoft
come up with in place of WinFS.
/Jonas Sundström. www.kirilla.com
Wonder if 'born-again-F/OSS' IBM might GPL/BSDL/similar license
the Warp metadata model and SOM as they have JFS?