DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2005-03
Re: Version numbering for release DECISION!
Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
-CURRENT Will indicate a build based on the head of the CVS
Can we use EXPERIMENTAL instead of CURRENT? Semantically, it's
No it isn't... "experimental" suggests something untested that may or
may not be retained in future. I think most commits to CURRENT are
already tested and will not be backed out, only debugged. BSD users
know what "current" means. Or something like "DEVEL" may be
When I suggested 'EXPERIMENTAL' is was solely with
the idea of one-off testing of patch 'sets' attempting
to address, for example, specific hardware interactions.
These would by definition not be applicable to general
use, though test and feedback might point the way to
development of a revision that could become such.
At the same time, there is probably no real need for
such a 'class', as it would be fairly rare - and largely
unsupportable - to have to change more than a few
'chunks' of source at a time.
- Hardly what could be called a 'release'.