Re: DragonFly_Stable tag

[Enemy God <jasse@xxxxxxxxx>]

justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > "Garance A Drosihn" <drosih@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:p0611041ebd6e72c13fc5@[128.113.24.47]...
> >
> > > At 2:46 PM -0700 9/15/04, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > >
> > > >    I am hoping to make DragonFly_Stable (maybe I should name it
> > > >    something else) just be a float tag indicating a 'reasonably
> > > >    stable point'
> > >
> > > Maybe some name to indicate that the tag itself is moving, and not
> > > a frozen point in time?  E.g.:  LATEST_SAFEBUILD  RECENT_RESTSTOP
> > > or MOVING_TARGET (heh).
> >
> > What about LATEST_STABLE_BUILD?  It has all the good connotations of
> > "stable", with an indicator that it's a moving tag.
>
>
> or KNOWN_GOOD, as that's what it was being called on the website when we
> had a 'known good' ISO.  What do we then call 'tag=.'?

MAY_THE_SOURCE_BE_WITH_YOU

Sorry. just couldn't resist it.

> We should probably have cvsup config files to match.

--
     Jasse -- Old Os/2 junkies never die, we just keep on rocking