|From:||"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 3 Sep 2004 20:05:08 +0200|
:considering that operating systems in general (and dfly in special)
:have lots of finite state machines in source - most of them hidden as
:evil if/else constructs of which the authors supposedly never heard
:about FSM before.
:Is it a good or bad idea to have a (simple) FSM framework available
:which can be used by different parts of the operating system? If yes,
:do such frameworks already exist?
:Just a thought because of the need to implement a i8254 PIT emulation...
Well, I don't think it's really applicable to what the kernel
has to do in most cases. For example, emulating an 8254 with an FSM
would basically require emulating the 8254's logic, which would take
megabytes through a generic FSM module, even one designed for logic
emulation. But it would only a few kilobytes if you 'faked' it in C
(emulated the 8254 at a functional level rather then at a logic
state_idle: if: written_byte & WHATEVER_BITMASK newstate: state_program_oneshot output: this_var = that_var; run_foo();
-- /"\ \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News
Description: This is a digitally signed message part