Re: kernel broken using CPUTYPE and 2.95.4

[David Rhodus <drhodus@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 10, 2004, at 3:40 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:

> -On [20040510 17:12], David Rhodus (drhodus@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > I don't think theres anyway we can support the P4 option any time soon
> > and I know that theres no chance of it working under gcc 2.95.
>
> Well, thing is, I've been using it for months now on that box at work.
> And with recent changes (anything between now and 19 March *cough*)
> caused it to show this on boot.
>
> Just wanted to clarify that GCC can create lovely executables with
> CPUTYPE.
> This should be a FAQ, red outlined with exclamation marks the side of
> the screen...

Well we already have a mudge in for when people try to use -O3 on a
kernel build, I wonder if we should add this in too ?:-/ Saying that 
even
though I don't like messing around with the options a user has 
specified.

-DR