Re: devfs vs udev/hotplug

[Hiten Pandya <hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In-Reply-To: <20040422045555.GA6431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.5.196.189
X-Trace: 1082611914 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 50176 80.5.196.189
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:4729

Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:16:59PM -0500, Dave Leimbach wrote:
> 
>>>    Devices are not created and destroyed all that often, so performance 
>>>    isn't really an issue.
>>
>>Sure.. unless you like to plug in and unplug your USB keyboard a lot and very
>>fast... 
> 
> 
> You know, that is asking for trouble :) IIRC the USB stack still has
> some problems with fast attachment/detachment of devices.

	I don't think it is that much of a major issue/trouble that
	it would hold back development of such a daemon/facility.
	One can always introduce a quirks table! *me ducks* ;-)

		-Hiten
		Hiten Pandya
		hmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx