DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-08
Re: sys/ tree re-structuring proposal
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:17:30PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Have you considered giving subversion a test-run? It works pretty much
> :just like cvs from a command line interface, but actually lets you do
> :versioned moves and that sort of thing. If you're interested I can
> :convert the current cvs tree to an svn tree and put it online for people
> :to try out.
> :chip norkus; renaissance hacker; wd@xxxxxxxx
> No. The actual repository work is the easy part. Rewiring the build
> system and Makefile's is the hard part.
IMHO, when we get some timer after finishing most of the kernel
work, we need to redo the Makefile system, so it is a little
Also, we would want to make our network tree flexilble, in the
sense, you can pull out or push in (via a moduler approach) any
network protocol/interface we don't like on the fly.
And things like IRQ affinity, Binding specific processes to one
or a range of CPUs, and nifty thing.... :-)
Secondly, I have written a TODO system, which uses XML+XSL that
has support for sub-taks, and assigning owner/status to
sub-tasks etc. I will finish it once I am back from .de.
Hiten M. Pandya