Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16.08.2005, at 14:24, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > The standard is clear to me: it doesn't talk about links, but symbolic
> > links.
> No, it has been talking about symlinks explicitly before.

I don't get your point.  Could you please show me the complete section 
in the standard, so that it is clear that the standard talks about 
(hard)links between files?

> Matt, could we settle this down in the follow way:
> (1) Revert to the old behaviour by explicitly checking for identical
> vnodes and returning success [instead of deleting old].
> (2) Ask for a rational and clarification on the SUS lists.
> (3) Based on the outcome decide which behaviour we want.

agree with 2+3, disagree with 1

cheers
  simon

--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part