| From: | "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:24:04 +0200 |
Lately Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Whoops, we have a problem with the ctype code... it is not properly > folding negative integers (i.e. when a signed char is passed to > an is*() function). > > The is*() functions are returning non-zero for all negative numbers, > which is wrong. uhm, actually not... I was confused as well, but it was my utf-8 xterm playing tricks on me. If you look close, the program just outputs printable chars (at least on syscons), it skips some in between. I don't get the system. As soon as you assign the int to any char (signed, unsigned, plain) and pass this char, the negative numbers are not shown. cheers simon -- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low $$$ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Attachment:
pgp00006.pgp
Description: PGP signature