Re: [issue632] update libm for improved C99 compatibility

[Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

:Peter Avalos wrote:
:> I'm not saying that we are C99 compliant in libm, but we're at least up-to-
:> date with NetBSD.
:
:Good stuff - I hadn't got around to another audio-apps build attempt, so
:it hadn't bugged me again yet :)
:
:Perhaps now some more things will build ..
:
:Thanks,
:
:- Chris

    A lot of the work on the code base winds up being 'maintainance' like
    this.  It does make our jobs a lot easier down the road when we decide
    to take that final step to actual conformance.

    It's also a good way to break up a large coding job into smaller more
    easily handled pieces.  Once you get rid of all the easy-to-do
    low-hanging fruit the hard bits will seem less hard.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>