:> Personally I have an alias rd=rmdir (and md=mkdir), which
:> is a left-over from my old DOS days. :-)
:> By the way, shouldn't -f override any previous -i or -I
:> option? At least that's what I would expect. You don't
:> type -f without a reason.
:This has been discussed (to death) before. I'd be all in for that, but
:other people weren't.
Yah. I've been going against popular opinion on this matter and I'm
going to continue going against it. -I is not overriden by -f. -I
does apply only to interactive shells, though, so it will not blow up