DragonFly bugs List (threaded) for 2005-06
Re: /bin/sh or /bin/ash
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:20:17PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>:I just discovered /bin/sh is really ash, per /usr/src/bin/sh/TOUR (it
>:supports $(( 1 + 2 )) whereas Bourne sh does not), so I was wondering
>:should sh be a symlink to ash? I don't even see ash in my PATH.
>:George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE
> No, I think its best not to make a link. We already have enough
> shell names to deal with, it would just add confusion.
Do you think "anyone will ever go back" and would you accept a dfports
patch to adjust vim syntax highlighting accordingly? -- that's my
primary concern, whenever I do arithmetic in /bin/sh scripts, I error
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE
http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@xxxxxxxxx