Re: IPFW2 layer2 support broken.

[Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Erik P. Skaalerud wrote:
> This isnt exactly on topic with the subject, but perhaps its time to 
> remove IPFW and natd? We have PF in base, wich in my opinion is 
> superiour to IPFW..
>
> (please, do not start a flame war, I'm just asking here).
>
> - Erik

Now that we have IPFW2 working (or will soon) thanks to Gary Allan's
tracking down the problem with ethernet headers, I wouldn't mind
getting rid of IPFW1.