DragonFly bugs List (threaded) for 2004-07
Re: Unusual error message from gcc34 ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-Trace: 1089172278 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 50174 184.108.40.206
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.bugs:1591
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> libtool tries to provide a portable interface for (a) building shared objects
> and libs and (b) accessing shared objects. But it achieves this via a lot
> of complicated, difficult hacks because it isn't easy to customize via
> a local config file and depends on the built-in magic. Like most GNUware
> does. *sigh*
Hm. I'm one of the maintainers of our build systems at work (mainly
because I'm one of the few masochistic enough to hack the makefiles).
Things change constantly -- we're always working to improve things, add
new platforms, new configurations, parallel builds -- but we've never
had the issues that libtool tries to fix.
Actually, our greatest annoyance is versioning of system files. We keep
our systems reasonably up-to-date (the normal security fixes, etc.); but
it's damn annoying when your executable won't run at a client site
because they have libc.so.220.127.116.11.7 installed instead of .8, which fixed
something like an LC_COLLATE bug in the Grzyzkistan locale.
For this reason, our official builds take place on ridiculously