Re: troubles with caps

[Tomaz Borstnar <tomaz.borstnar@xxxxxxxx>]

Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >      - Cache results locally so it does not have to perform an IPC for
> > 	every request (CAPS has or will have a mechanism whereby the
> > 	service will be able to notify clients of changes to have clients
> > 	invalidate their caches).
>
>
> I would skip that part for the moment. This one should be evaluated wether
> it is worth the effort. E.g. for uid <=> name mappings most portable apps
> already cache them internally.

nscd-like daemon which can optionally cache things - depends on needs 
and memory.

Tomaž