DragonFly bugs List (threaded) for 2003-11
Re: nasty port bug
> I'm sorry, but some ports are just not going to build for a while. Maybe
> you can send
> patches to the vendor to support the DragonFly name, I'm not totally
> sure what the best
> option is going to be for a while. I think were just going to have to
> deal with some
> little things like ports being broken.
Sure, we can live with that, especially given the fact
that you guys have *really* better things to do.
Personally I'd like to see this name cache thing.
(Not trying to push anyone here though...)
I may even live with binary packages for the time being.
(And I really don't like that ;-)
Maybe we could (ab)?use this mailinglist to exchange our
problems and solutions ?
This way we avoid cluttering kernel@ and still wouldn't
have to maintain personal lists.
Campus der Max-Planck-Institute Tübingen
Netzwerk- und Systemadministration
Tel: +49 7071 601 598
Fax: +49 7071 601 616