IEEE(3) DragonFly Library Functions Manual IEEE(3)## NAME

ieee-- IEEE standard 754 for floating-point arithmetic## DESCRIPTION

The IEEE Standard 754 for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic defines repre- sentations of floating-point numbers and abstract properties of arith- metic operations relating to precision, rounding, and exceptional cases, as described below.IEEESTANDARD754Floating-PointArithmeticRadix: Binary. Overflow and underflow: Overflow goes by default to a signed infinity. Underflow isgradual. Zero is represented ambiguously as +0 or -0. Its sign transforms correctly through multiplication or division, and is preserved by addition of zeros with like signs; but x-x yields +0 for every finite x. The only operations that reveal zero's sign are division by zero andcopysign(x,+-0). In particu- lar, comparison (x > y, x >= y, etc.) cannot be affected by the sign of zero; but if finite x = y then infinity = 1/(x-y) != -1/(y-x) = -infinity. Infinity is signed. It persists when added to itself or to any finite number. Its sign transforms correctly through multiplication and division, and (finite)/+-infinity = +-0 (nonzero)/0 = +-infinity. But infin- ity-infinity, infinity*0 and infinity/infinity are, like 0/0 and sqrt(-3), invalid operations that produceNaN. ... Reserved operands (NaNs): AnNaNis (NotaNumber). SomeNaNs, called SignalingNaNs, trap any floating-point operation performed upon them; they are used to mark missing or uninitialized values, or nonexistent elements of arrays. The rest are QuietNaNs; they are the default results of Invalid Operations, and propagate through subsequent arithmetic operations. If x != x then x isNaN; every other predicate (x > y, x = y, x < y, ...) is FALSE ifNaNis involved. Rounding: Every algebraic operation (+, -, *, /, \/) is rounded by default to within half anulp, and when the rounding error is exactly half anulpthen the rounded value's least significant bit is zero. (Anulpis oneUnit in theLastPlace.) This kind of rounding is usu- ally the best kind, sometimes provably so; for instance, for every x = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, ..., 2.0**52, we find (x/3.0)*3.0 == x and (x/10.0)*10.0 == x and ... despite that both the quotients and the products have been rounded. Only rounding like IEEE 754 can do that. But no single kind of rounding can be proved best for every circumstance, so IEEE 754 provides rounding towards zero or towards +infinity or towards -infinity at the programmer's option. Exceptions: IEEE 754 recognizes five kinds of floating-point exceptions, listed below in declining order of probable importance.ExceptionDefaultResultInvalid OperationNaN, or FALSE Overflow +-infinity Divide by Zero +-infinity Underflow Gradual Underflow Inexact Rounded value NOTE: An Exception is not an Error unless handled badly. What makes a class of exceptions exceptional is that no single default response can be satisfactory in every instance. On the other hand, if a default response will serve most instances satisfactorily, the unsatisfactory instances cannot justify aborting computation every time the exception occurs.DataFormatsSingle-precision: Type name:floatWordsize: 32 bits. Precision: 24 significant bits, roughly like 7 significant deci- mals. If x and x' are consecutive positive single-precision numbers (they differ by 1ulp), then 5.9e-08 < 0.5**24 < (x'-x)/x <= 0.5**23 < 1.2e-07. Range: Overflow threshold = 2.0**128 = 3.4e38 Underflow threshold = 0.5**126 = 1.2e-38 Underflowed results round to the nearest integer multiple of 0.5**149 = 1.4e-45. Double-precision: Type name:double(On some architectures,longdoubleis the same asdouble) Wordsize: 64 bits. Precision: 53 significant bits, roughly like 16 significant deci- mals. If x and x' are consecutive positive double-precision numbers (they differ by 1ulp), then 1.1e-16 < 0.5**53 < (x'-x)/x <= 0.5**52 < 2.3e-16. Range: Overflow threshold = 2.0**1024 = 1.8e308 Underflow threshold = 0.5**1022 = 2.2e-308 Underflowed results round to the nearest integer multiple of 0.5**1074 = 4.9e-324. Extended-precision: Type name:longdouble(when supported by the hardware) Wordsize: 96 bits. Precision: 64 significant bits, roughly like 19 significant deci- mals. If x and x' are consecutive positive extended-precision numbers (they differ by 1ulp), then 1.0e-19 < 0.5**63 < (x'-x)/x <= 0.5**62 < 2.2e-19. Range: Overflow threshold = 2.0**16384 = 1.2e4932 Underflow threshold = 0.5**16382 = 3.4e-4932 Underflowed results round to the nearest integer multiple of 0.5**16445 = 5.7e-4953. Quad-extended-precision: Type name:longdouble(when supported by the hardware) Wordsize: 128 bits. Precision: 113 significant bits, roughly like 34 significant deci- mals. If x and x' are consecutive positive quad-extended-precision num- bers (they differ by 1ulp), then 9.6e-35 < 0.5**113 < (x'-x)/x <= 0.5**112 < 2.0e-34. Range: Overflow threshold = 2.0**16384 = 1.2e4932 Underflow threshold = 0.5**16382 = 3.4e-4932 Underflowed results round to the nearest integer multiple of 0.5**16494 = 6.5e-4966.AdditionalInformationRegardingExceptionsFor each kind of floating-point exception, IEEE 754 provides a Flag that is raised each time its exception is signaled, and stays raised until the program resets it. Programs may also test, save and restore a flag. Thus, IEEE 754 provides three ways by which programs may cope with excep- tions for which the default result might be unsatisfactory: 1. Test for a condition that might cause an exception later, and branch to avoid the exception. 2. Test a flag to see whether an exception has occurred since the pro- gram last reset its flag. 3. Test a result to see whether it is a value that only an exception could have produced. CAUTION: The only reliable ways to discover whether Underflow has occurred are to test whether products or quotients lie closer to zero than the underflow threshold, or to test the Underflow flag. (Sums and differences cannot underflow in IEEE 754; if x != y then x-y is correct to full precision and certainly nonzero regardless of how tiny it may be.) Products and quotients that underflow gradu- ally can lose accuracy gradually without vanishing, so comparing them with zero (as one might on a VAX) will not reveal the loss. Fortunately, if a gradually underflowed value is destined to be added to something bigger than the underflow threshold, as is almost always the case, digits lost to gradual underflow will not be missed because they would have been rounded off anyway. So gradual under- flows are usuallyprovablyignorable. The same cannot be said of underflows flushed to 0. At the option of an implementor conforming to IEEE 754, other ways to cope with exceptions may be provided: 1. ABORT. This mechanism classifies an exception in advance as an incident to be handled by means traditionally associated with error- handling statements like "ON ERROR GO TO ...". Different languages offer different forms of this statement, but most share the follow- ing characteristics:-No means is provided to substitute a value for the offending operation's result and resume computation from what may be the middle of an expression. An exceptional result is abandoned.-In a subprogram that lacks an error-handling statement, an exception causes the subprogram to abort within whatever program called it, and so on back up the chain of calling subprograms until an error-handling statement is encountered or the whole task is aborted and memory is dumped. 2. STOP. This mechanism, requiring an interactive debugging environ- ment, is more for the programmer than the program. It classifies an exception in advance as a symptom of a programmer's error; the exception suspends execution as near as it can to the offending operation so that the programmer can look around to see how it hap- pened. Quite often the first several exceptions turn out to be quite unexceptionable, so the programmer ought ideally to be able to resume execution after each one as if execution had not been stopped. 3. ... Other ways lie beyond the scope of this document. Ideally, each elementary function should act as if it were indivisible, or atomic, in the sense that ... 1. No exception should be signaled that is not deserved by the data supplied to that function. 2. Any exception signaled should be identified with that function rather than with one of its subroutines. 3. The internal behavior of an atomic function should not be disrupted when a calling program changes from one to another of the five or so ways of handling exceptions listed above, although the definition of the function may be correlated intentionally with exception han- dling. The functions inlibmare only approximately atomic. They signal no inappropriate exception except possibly ... Over/Underflow when a result, if properly computed, might have lain barely within range, and Inexact incabs(),cbrt(),hypot(),log10() andpow() when it happens to be exact, thanks to fortuitous cancella- tion of errors. Otherwise, ... Invalid Operation is signaled only when any result butNaNwould probably be misleading. Overflow is signaled only when the exact result would be finite but beyond the overflow threshold. Divide-by-Zero is signaled only when a function takes exactly infinite values at finite oper- ands. Underflow is signaled only when the exact result would be nonzero but tinier than the underflow threshold. Inexact is signaled only when greater range or precision would be needed to represent the exact result.## SEE ALSO

fenv(3), ieee_test(3), math(3) An explanation of IEEE 754 and its proposed extension p854 was published in the IEEE magazine MICRO in August 1984 under the title "A Proposed Radix- and Word-length-independent Standard for Floating-point Arith- metic" by W. J. Cody et al. The manuals for Pascal, C and BASIC on the Apple Macintosh document the features of IEEE 754 pretty well. Articles in the IEEE magazine COMPUTER vol. 14 no. 3 (Mar. 1981), and in the ACM SIGNUM Newsletter Special Issue of Oct. 1979, may be helpful although they pertain to superseded drafts of the standard.## STANDARDS

IEEE Std 754-1985 DragonFly 3.9 January 26, 2005 DragonFly 3.9